Changes from Version 1 of ecell3/CompilerBenchmark

Author:

yuri (IP: 10.1.1.6)

Timestamp:

11/05/2007 02:29:00 AM (3 years ago)

Comment:

--

ecell3/CompilerBenchmark

@@ +1 @@
+== Bench++ ==
+
+{{{
+  a000010.h    class duration
+  a000012.cpp  implementation of class duration for UNIX systems
+               using times(3), Windows NT using GetProcessTimes(),
+               Windows or Windows/95 using clock(), and Macintosh
+               using Microseconds().
+
+               Note: Please send in other implementations
+
+  a000021.h    class break_optimization :  optimization control
+  a000022.cpp  implementation of class break_optimization
+
+  a000031.h    class iteration :           Iteration control
+  a000032.cpp  implementation of class iteration
+
+  a000041.h    procedure piwg_io declaration : output
+
+  a000042.cpp  implementation of procedure piwg_io
+
+  a000047.h   class piwg_timer_generic
+  a000048.cpp implementaion of class piwg_timer_generic
+
+  a000095.cpp A program to read a log file from a run and
+              produce a compact listing in "bench.tbl".
+
+  a000096.cpp A program to read multiple "bench.tbl" files and
+              produce a performance comparison summary.
+
+  a000097.cpp A program to read a "bench.tbl" file and produce
+              various interesting performance ratios, based on
+              the rules in the "RATIOS" file.
+
+  a000099.cpp  This is a skeleton procedure that can be copied and edited
+                 to construct more tests. DO NOT COMPILE THIS. It is for 
+                 editing to make more tests.
+
+  a000100.cpp  This is a top level procedure that calls all the other
+                 executable timing tests. It is useful if there is no "make"
+                 facility available.
+
+  p000000.h    Header file for the "p" tests
+
+  p000000.cpp  Separate compilation of the procedures for the "p" tests
+               to prevent inlining.
+
+  s000005.h    Header file for the Stepanov "s" tests.
+
+  FIRST OF EXECUTION TESTS.
+
+  a000090.cpp  Measure clock resolution by second differences
+  a000091.cpp  Dhrystone
+  a000092.cpp  Whetstone
+  a000094a..k  Hennesy benchmarks
+
+                 This group of tests measures the performance of some
+                 real (useful) C++ code, including a tracker algorithm,
+                 an Orbit calculation, a Kalman filter, and a Centroid
+                 algorithm.  Here is where other small useful benchmarks
+                 should be added.  Please send ideas to 
+                 "joseph.orost@att.com".
+  b000002b.cpp Tracker: float
+  b000003b.cpp Tracker: double
+  b000004b.cpp Tracker: float & int
+  b000010.cpp  Orbit
+  b000011.cpp  Kalman
+  b000013.cpp  Centroid
+
+                 This group of tests measures dynamic allocation related
+                 timing.
+  d000001.cpp  malloc & free: 1000 ints
+  d000002.cpp  malloc & init & free: 1000 ints
+  d000003.cpp  new & delete: 1000 ints
+  d000004.cpp  new & init & delete: 1000 ints
+  d000005.cpp  alloca: 1000 ints        (optional test)
+  d000006.cpp  alloca & init: 1000 ints (optional test)
+
+                 This group of tests measures exception related timing.
+                 For historical reasons, e000005 is missing.
+  e000001.cpp  Local exception caught
+  e000002.cpp  Class method exception caught
+  e000003.cpp  Procedure exception caught: 3-deep
+  e000004.cpp  Procedure exception caught: 4-deep
+  e000006.cpp  Declared Procedure exception caught: 4-deep
+  e000007.cpp  Procedure exception caught: 4-deep re-thrown at each level
+  e000008.cpp  Procedure exception 4-deep: Implemented using setjmp/longjmp
+
+                 This group of tests measures coding style related timing.
+  f000001.cpp  Boolean assignment
+  f000002.cpp  Boolean if
+  f000003.cpp  2-way if/else
+  f000004.cpp  2-way switch
+  f000005.cpp  10-way if/else
+  f000006.cpp  10-way switch
+  f000007.cpp  10-way sparse switch
+  f000008.cpp  10-way virtual function call
+
+                 This group of tests measures I/O related timing.
+  g000001.cpp  iostream.getline: 20 char buffer
+  g000002.cpp  iostream.>> : 20 chars in loop
+  g000003.cpp  iostream.<< : 20 char buffer
+  g000004.cpp  iostream.<< : 20 chars in loop
+  g000005.cpp  istrstream.>> : int
+  g000006.cpp  istrstream.>> : float
+  g000007.cpp  fstream.open/fstream.close
+
+                 This group of tests measures machine level features.
+  h000001.cpp  packed bit arrays
+  h000002.cpp  unpacked bit arrays
+  h000003.cpp  packed bit ops in loop
+  h000004.cpp  unpacked bit ops in loop
+  h000005.cpp  int conversion
+  h000006.cpp  10-float conversion
+  h000007.cpp  bit-fields
+  h000008.cpp  bit-fields and packed bit array
+  h000009.cpp  pack and unpack class objects
+
+                 This group of tests measures loop overhead related timing.
+  l000001.cpp  "for" loop
+  l000002.cpp  "while" loop
+  l000003.cpp  inf. loop w/break
+  l000004.cpp  5-iteration loop
+
+                 This group of tests measures optimizer performance.
+  o000001a.cpp Constant Propagation (including math functions)
+  o000001b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000002a.cpp Local Common Sub-expression (including math functions)
+  o000002b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000003a.cpp Global Common Sub-expression
+  o000003b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000004a.cpp Unnecessary Copy
+  o000004b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000005a.cpp Code Motion (including math functions)
+  o000005b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000006a.cpp Induction Variable
+  o000006b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000007a.cpp Reduction in Strength (including math functions)
+  o000007b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000008a.cpp Dead Code
+  o000008b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000009a.cpp Loop Jamming
+  o000009b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000010a.cpp Redundant Code
+  o000010b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000011a.cpp Unreachable Code
+  o000011b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+  o000012a.cpp String Ops
+  o000012b.cpp " Hand Optimized
+
+                 This group of tests measures procedure call related timing.
+                 There is no test p000009, nor 14 thru 19.
+  p000001.cpp  Procedure Call: No Args
+  p000002.cpp  Procedure Call: No Args: Catches Exceptions
+  p000003.cpp  Static Class Method Call: No Args: Catches Exceptions
+  p000004.cpp  Inline Procedure Call: No Args
+  p000005.cpp  Static Class Method Call: 1-int Arg: Catches Exceptions
+  p000006.cpp  Static Class Method Call: 1-int *Arg: Catches Exceptions
+  p000007.cpp  Static Class Method Call: 1-int &Arg: Catches Exceptions
+  p000008.cpp  Procedure Call: No Parameters: Called thru pointer, Catches Excep
+tions
+  p000010.cpp  Procedure Call: 10-int Args: Catches Exceptions
+  p000011.cpp  Procedure Call: 20-int Args: Catches Exceptions
+  p000012.cpp  Procedure Call: 10-(3-int) Args: Catches Exceptions
+  p000013.cpp  Procedure Call: 20-(3-int) Args: Catches Exceptions
+  p000020.cpp  Class Method Call: 1-"this" Arg: Catches Exceptions
+  p000021.cpp  Virtual Class Method Call: 1-"this" Arg: Catches Exceptions
+  p000022.cpp  Virtual Const Class Method Call: 1-"this" Arg: Catches Exceptions
+  p000023.cpp  Same as p000022: called in loop to see if lookup is optimized
+
+                 This group of tests measures object oriented style vs.
+                 C style.
+  s000001a.cpp Max: C++ Style
+  s000001b.cpp Max: C Style
+  s000002a.cpp Matrix: C++ Style
+  s000002b.cpp Matrix: C Style
+  s000003a.cpp Iterator: C++ Style
+  s000003b.cpp Iterator: C Style
+  s000004a.cpp Complex: C++ Style
+  s000004b.cpp Complex: C Style
+  s000005a.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 12
+  s000005b.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 11
+  s000005c.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 10
+  s000005d.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 9
+  s000005e.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 8
+  s000005f.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 7
+  s000005g.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 6
+  s000005h.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 5
+  s000005i.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 4
+  s000005j.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 3
+  s000005k.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 2
+  s000005l.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 1
+  s000005m.cpp Stepanov: C++ Style Abstraction Level 0
+}}}
+
+
+P4 xeon 1.7GHz vs UP1100 21264 700MHz
+(RedHat's gcc-2.96)
+{{{
+          RELATIVE TIMES ..........
+TEST NAME         
+                  
+          -O2 -O2 
+--------- --- --- 
+A000091   1.00 1.47 
+A000092   1.00 2.73 
+A000094a  1.00 1.90 
+A000094b  1.00 1.79 
+A000094c  1.00 1.39 
+
+A000094d  1.00 1.44 
+A000094e  1.00 1.27 
+A000094f  1.00 2.24 
+A000094g  1.00 1.24 
+A000094h  1.00 1.28 
+
+A000094i  1.00 1.62 
+A000094j  1.00 1.40 
+A000094k  1.00 1.17 
+B000002b  1.00 7.20 
+B000003b  1.00 5.23 
+
+B000004b  1.00 9.06 
+B000010   1.00 1.08 
+B000011   1.00 2.36 
+B000013   1.00 1.60 
+D000001   1.00 1.04 
+
+D000002   1.00 2.19 
+D000003   1.00 1.04 
+D000004   1.00 2.16 
+D000005   1.00 2.46 
+D000006   1.00 2.37 
+
+E000001   1.00 1.80 
+E000002   1.00 1.63 
+E000003   1.00 2.76 
+E000004   1.00 3.20 
+E000007   1.00 3.90 
+
+E000008   1.00 2.86 
+F000001   1.00 inf 
+F000002   1.00 3.33 
+F000003   1.00 --   
+F000004   1.00 4.76 
+
+F000005   1.00 2.05 
+F000006   1.00 2.77 
+F000007   1.00 8.29 
+F000008   1.00 0.92 
+G000001   1.00 1.02 
+
+G000002   1.00 1.65 
+G000003   1.00 10.26 
+G000004   1.00 3.11 
+G000005   1.00 1.05 
+G000006   1.00 2.94 
+
+G000007   1.00 0.94 
+H000001   1.00 1.13 
+H000002   1.00 1.55 
+H000003   1.00 1.37 
+H000004   1.00 2.88 
+
+H000005   1.00 --   
+H000006   1.00 0.49 
+H000007   1.00 0.26 
+H000008   1.00 8.58 
+H000009   1.00 0.95 
+
+L000001   1.00 2.10 
+L000002   1.00 2.07 
+L000003   1.00 1.80 
+L000004   1.00 3.80 
+O000001a  1.00 3.24 
+
+O000001b  1.00 3.32 
+O000002a  1.00 6.22 
+O000002b  1.00 5.13 
+O000003a  1.00 1.67 
+O000003b  1.00 1.50 
+
+O000004a  1.00 0.47 
+O000004b  1.00 0.40 
+O000005a  1.00 20.60 
+O000005b  1.00 5.87 
+O000006a  1.00 3.28 
+
+O000006b  1.00 3.13 
+O000007a  1.00 1.20 
+O000007b  1.00 1.70 
+O000008a  1.00 0.72 
+O000008b  1.00 0.41 
+
+O000009a  1.00 1.35 
+O000009b  1.00 1.61 
+O000010a  1.00 0.75 
+O000010b  1.00 1.43 
+O000011a  1.00 0.14 
+
+O000011b  1.00 0.25 
+O000012a  1.00 0.25 
+O000012b  1.00 0.61 
+P000001   1.00 0.64 
+P000002   1.00 1.57 
+
+P000003   1.00 1.78 
+P000004   1.00 inf 
+P000005   1.00 2.66 
+P000006   1.00 1.99 
+P000007   1.00 2.06 
+
+P000008   1.00 2.76 
+P000010   1.00 1.34 
+P000011   1.00 3.23 
+P000012   1.00 0.24 
+P000013   1.00 0.23 
+
+P000020   1.00 1.70 
+P000021   1.00 34.29 
+P000022   1.00 14.16 
+P000023   1.00 1.00 
+S000001a  1.00 1.32 
+
+S000001b  1.00 4.43 
+S000002a  1.00 2.65 
+S000002b  1.00 2.70 
+S000003a  1.00 --   
+S000003b  1.00 --   
+
+S000004a  1.00 --   
+S000004b  1.00 --   
+S000005a  1.00 1.22 
+S000005b  1.00 1.21 
+S000005c  1.00 1.71 
+
+S000005d  1.00 1.19 
+S000005e  1.00 1.49 
+S000005f  1.00 1.20 
+S000005g  1.00 1.49 
+S000005h  1.00 1.47 
+
+S000005i  1.00 1.54 
+S000005j  1.00 1.48 
+S000005k  1.00 1.82 
+S000005l  1.00 1.48 
+S000005m  1.00 1.91 
+}}}
+
+
+
+
+
+P4 xeon 1.7GHz vs UP1100 21264 700MHz
+(RedHat's gcc-2.96 vs Compaq's cxx)
+
+{{{
+          RELATIVE TIMES ..........
+TEST NAME         
+                  
+          -O2 -O2 
+--------- --- --- 
+A000091   1.00 1.32 
+A000092   1.00 0.82 
+A000094a  1.00 2.76 
+A000094b  1.00 2.32 
+A000094c  1.00 1.92 
+
+A000094d  1.00 0.82 
+A000094e  1.00 1.05 
+A000094f  1.00 2.13 
+A000094g  1.00 1.17 
+A000094h  1.00 1.12 
+
+A000094i  1.00 2.57 
+A000094j  1.00 0.43 
+A000094k  1.00 0.78 
+B000002b  1.00 1.50 
+B000003b  1.00 1.24 
+
+B000004b  1.00 1.86 
+B000010   1.00 0.20 
+B000011   1.00 0.85 
+B000013   1.00 0.81 
+D000001   1.00 1.09 
+
+D000002   1.00 1.42 
+D000003   1.00 1.15 
+D000004   1.00 1.43 
+D000005   1.00 0.78 
+D000006   1.00 1.51 
+
+E000001   1.00 0.26 
+E000002   1.00 0.15 
+E000003   1.00 0.15 
+E000004   1.00 0.14 
+E000007   1.00 0.08 
+
+E000008   1.00 2.04 
+F000001   1.00 inf 
+F000002   1.00 2.27 
+F000003   1.00 --   
+F000004   1.00 22.95 
+
+F000005   1.00 2.93 
+F000006   1.00 --   
+F000007   1.00 2.53 
+F000008   1.00 --   
+G000001   1.00 0.95 
+
+G000002   1.00 0.60 
+G000003   1.00 6.88 
+G000004   1.00 2.45 
+G000005   1.00 1.39 
+G000006   1.00 3.75 
+
+G000007   1.00 0.80 
+H000001   1.00 0.75 
+H000002   1.00 0.98 
+H000003   1.00 0.72 
+H000004   1.00 0.85 
+
+H000005   1.00 --   
+H000006   1.00 1.93 
+H000007   1.00 0.13 
+H000008   1.00 2.36 
+H000009   1.00 0.41 
+
+L000001   1.00 --   
+L000002   1.00 --   
+L000003   1.00 --   
+L000004   1.00 0.92 
+O000001a  1.00 2.89 
+
+O000001b  1.00 3.06 
+O000002a  1.00 0.53 
+O000002b  1.00 0.47 
+O000003a  1.00 0.76 
+O000003b  1.00 0.75 
+
+O000004a  1.00 --   
+O000004b  1.00 --   
+O000005a  1.00 1.45 
+O000005b  1.00 1.66 
+O000006a  1.00 2.86 
+
+O000006b  1.00 0.88 
+O000007a  1.00 0.70 
+O000007b  1.00 0.89 
+O000008a  1.00 --   
+O000008b  1.00 --   
+
+O000009a  1.00 0.79 
+O000009b  1.00 0.91 
+O000010a  1.00 0.31 
+O000010b  1.00 --   
+O000011a  1.00 --   
+
+O000011b  1.00 --   
+O000012a  1.00 0.24 
+O000012b  1.00 0.47 
+P000001   1.00 0.05 
+P000002   1.00 77.00 
+
+P000003   1.00 77.87 
+P000004   1.00 inf 
+P000005   1.00 96.87 
+P000006   1.00 65.01 
+P000007   1.00 64.51 
+
+P000008   1.00 47.39 
+P000010   1.00 34.26 
+P000011   1.00 54.41 
+P000012   1.00 2.12 
+P000013   1.00 1.17 
+
+P000020   1.00 65.23 
+P000021   1.00 250.48 
+P000022   1.00 289.11 
+P000023   1.00 54.53 
+S000001a  1.00 2.72 
+
+S000001b  1.00 3.74 
+S000002a  1.00 1.53 
+S000002b  1.00 1.73 
+S000003a  1.00 1.74 
+S000003b  1.00 1.80 
+
+S000004a  1.00 0.07 
+S000004b  1.00 1.22 
+S000005a  1.00 1.22 
+S000005b  1.00 1.25 
+S000005c  1.00 1.66 
+
+S000005d  1.00 0.85 
+S000005e  1.00 1.49 
+S000005f  1.00 1.20 
+S000005g  1.00 1.49 
+S000005h  1.00 1.49 
+
+S000005i  1.00 1.55 
+S000005j  1.00 1.49 
+S000005k  1.00 1.82 
+S000005l  1.00 1.49 
+S000005m  1.00 1.91 
+
+
+}}}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+== stepanov bench ==
+
+{{{
+To: ecell3-devel@bioinformatics.org, ecell-devel@eg.e-cell.org
+Subject: [Ecell3-devel] C++ compiler benchmark
+From: Kouichi Takahashi <shafi@e-cell.org>
+Delivered-To: shafi@e-cell.org
+Message-Id: <200102161516.AAA11071@mail.sfc.keio.ac.jp>
+Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:19:47 +0900
+User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6
+ (Ãæ¥Î¾±) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 12) (Channel Islands)
+ (i386-redhat-linux)
+Organization: E-CELL Project
+MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu")
+X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000414(IM141)
+X-Mailman-Version: 1.0b10
+X-BeenThere: ecell3-devel@bioinformatics.org
+X-UIDL: d2490be6543d7278ffad9be0f7449751
+
+hi there ecell developers,
+
+
+I did a simple C++ benchmarking to find out answers to the following 
+two questions:
+
+- Should ecell3 continue to support and be tested on Linux/alpha?
+- If so, should ecell3 support cxx, Compaq's C++ compiler?
+
+
+Although alpha is known to beat IA32 completely if it comes to simple
+numerics (like LAPAK in fortran), it's performance in C++ was
+uncertain.  Unlike fortran, intensive pointer operations and language
+level abstractions characterize C++.
+
+I've used KAI's version of Stepanov Benchmark(Version 1.2), which is
+available at ftp://ftp.kai.com/pub/benchmarks/, to measure
+that kinds of performance.
+
+I ran the bench on these two machines:
+
+- dual alpha 21264A 677MHz, 2GB RAM (baobab.e-cell.org)
+  egcs-1.1.2 and cxx-6.3.9.5
+- Pentium-III 850MHz, 768MB RAM    (oak.e-cell.org)
+  gcc-2.96 (RH7)
+- Celelon 550MHz                    (potos.e-cell.org)
+
+(baobab is a master node of E-CELL Project's primary beowulf.
+ oak is our secondary computation server.)
+
+compilers:
+
+- egcs-1.1.2, gcc-2.95.2 and 2.96 (-O3)
+- cxx 6.3.9.5 (-fast -lcpml -O3)
+
+
+The benchmark consists of 12 variations of simple for loops.
+test 0 is a simple fortran-like one and 1-12 are STL ones.
+(test1: light abstraction <-> test 12: heavy abstraction)
+
+
+Summary of results:
+
+
+- alpha + cxx is incredibly fast.
+  (3.5x faster than alpha + egcs-1.1.2)
+
+- g++ is not good at alpha
+
+- gcc 2.95 is fairly good at STL 
+  (abstraction penalty is 0.83, which means that STL loops run faster
+   than the raw for loop.)
+  
+- RH7's gcc 2.96 is disappointing at STL (abstraction penalty: 1.48)
+  (I suspect this is a temporary regression and will be corrected in
+   gcc-3.0, since they are using the bench for code quality control.)  
+
+
+Conclusions:
+
+- platform: support alpha, definitely with cxx 
+
+- compiler: cxx or gcc-2.95
+            (wait for gcc-3.0 and run the bench again)
+
+
+And don't forget, this is just a benchmark on C++ pointer abstraction
+using simple for loops.  Undoubtedly alpha conquers IA32 in more
+numerically intensive functions like Substance::transit() and
+Reactor::react() in ecell.
+
+
+
+
+alpha + cxx:
+---------------------------------------------------
+test      absolute   additions      ratio with
+number    time       per second     test0
+
+ 0        0.09sec    556.84M         1.00
+ 1        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+ 2        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+ 3        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+ 4        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+ 5        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+ 6        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+ 7        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+ 8        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+ 9        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+10        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+11        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+12        0.09sec    582.15M         0.96
+mean:     0.09sec    580.17M         0.96
+
+Total absolute time: 1.12 sec
+
+Abstraction Penalty: 0.96
+---------------------------------------------------
+
+
+
+alpha + egcs-1.1.2
+---------------------------------------------------
+test      absolute   additions      ratio with
+number    time       per second     test0
+
+ 0        0.30sec    165.79M         1.00
+ 1        0.30sec    166.33M         1.00
+ 2        0.30sec    165.79M         1.00
+ 3        0.30sec    166.33M         1.00
+ 4        0.30sec    165.79M         1.00
+ 5        0.30sec    166.33M         1.00
+ 6        0.30sec    165.79M         1.00
+ 7        0.30sec    166.33M         1.00
+ 8        0.30sec    165.79M         1.00
+ 9        0.30sec    166.33M         1.00
+10        0.30sec    166.33M         1.00
+11        0.30sec    166.33M         1.00
+12        0.30sec    166.33M         1.00
+mean:     0.30sec    166.12M         1.00
+
+Total absolute time: 3.91 sec
+
+Abstraction Penalty: 1.00
+---------------------------------------------------
+
+
+Pentium III 850MHz + gcc-2.96(RH7)
+---------------------------------------------------
+test      absolute   additions      ratio with
+number    time       per second     test0
+
+ 0        0.17sec    294.12M         1.00
+ 1        0.20sec    250.00M         1.18
+ 2        0.18sec    277.78M         1.06
+ 3        0.26sec    192.31M         1.53
+ 4        0.26sec    192.31M         1.53
+ 5        0.26sec    192.31M         1.53
+ 6        0.26sec    192.31M         1.53
+ 7        0.26sec    192.31M         1.53
+ 8        0.26sec    192.31M         1.53
+ 9        0.26sec    192.31M         1.53
+10        0.26sec    192.31M         1.53
+11        0.35sec    142.86M         2.06
+12        0.36sec    138.89M         2.12
+mean:     0.25sec    198.81M         1.48
+
+Total absolute time: 3.34 sec
+
+Abstraction Penalty: 1.48
+---------------------------------------------------
+
+
+Celeron 550MHz + gcc-2.95.2
+---------------------------------------------------
+test      absolute   additions      ratio with
+number    time       per second     test0
+
+ 0        0.37sec    135.14M         1.00
+ 1        0.31sec    161.29M         0.84
+ 2        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+ 3        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+ 4        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+ 5        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+ 6        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+ 7        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+ 8        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+ 9        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+10        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+11        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+12        0.30sec    166.67M         0.81
+mean:     0.31sec    163.59M         0.83
+
+Total absolute time: 3.98 sec
+
+Abstraction Penalty: 0.83
+---------------------------------------------------
+
+
+
+
+-----
+Kouichi Takahashi                         E-CELL Project,
+email: shafi@sfc.keio.ac.jp               Institute for Advanced Biosciences
+       shafi@e-cell.org                   Keio Univ. SFC
+
+_______________________________________________
+Ecell3-devel maillist  -  Ecell3-devel@bioinformatics.org
+http://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/ecell3-devel
+
+
+
+
+}}}